兔寶寶痞客邦 首頁 網站導覽 加入最愛
English日本語

重要實務

【高雄-帝謙法律事務所/土地重要實務(10)】同一不動產設定典權後,在不妨害典權之範圍內,得再設定抵押權。

2014.3.4  高雄律師-楊岡儒律師

發文單位:司法院
解釋字號:釋字第139號
解釋日期:民國63年10月4日
解釋爭點:
同一不動產設定典權後,在不妨害典權之範圍內,得否再設定抵押權?
資料來源:司法院大法官會議解釋彙編 第 378 頁
                    司法院大法官解釋(一)(98年10月版)第 462-467 頁
相關法條:民法 第 762、880、882、918 條  ( 19.12.26 )

解 釋 文:
不動產所有人於同一不動產設定典權後,在不妨害典權之範圍內,仍得為他人設定抵押權,本院院字第一九二號解釋毋庸變更。

理由書:
按典權乃支付典價,占有他人之不動產,而為使用收益之權,與抵押權之係不移轉占有,有擔保債務之履行而設之擔保物權,其性質並非不能相容。不動產所有人於同一不動產設定典權後,其所有權尚未喪失,在不妨害典權之範圍內,再與他人設定抵押權,民法物權編既無禁止規定,自難認為不應准許。本院院字第一九二號解釋毋庸變更。


J. Y. Interpretation No.129
Date 1974.10.4

Issue
May an owner of immovable property create a mortgage on the property on which he has already created a right of dien to another person?

Holding
The owner of an immovable property may, after the creation of a right of dien on his property, create a mortgage to another person on the same property to the extent that the dien is not affected. Our Interpretation Yuan-tze No. 192 is reaffirmed without the necessity of change.

Reasoning
The right of dien is a right to use the immovable property of another person and to collect profits therefrom by paying a price and taking possession of the property. It differs from, but does not preclude, the creation of mortgage, which is a right over a thing created to secure the performance of a debt without having to transfer the possession of the property. The owner of an immovable property does not lose his title to the property by creating a right of dien thereon. Therefore, the Civil Code, in Book III, "Right Over Things", does not prohibit a property owner from creating a mortgage to another person on the same property insofar as the right of dien is not affected. Our Interpretation Yuan-tze No. 192 is reaffirmed without the necessity of change.

Translated by Raymond T. Chu.


 

圖片



上一則   |   回上頁   |   下一則